fbpx
Entrance Exam Date: 12/1/2020, 16/02/2020 & 15/03/2020
DTE Code: 6925

IISCM | Civil Jobs in Talegaon, Pune | Project Management Course in, Pune

Address: C/O Rainbow Housing, 7th floor, Pride Accord Building, Baner Road, Pune - 411007
Mobile: +91 9689 916 994 | +91 7709 860 093

How to Conduct a Risk Assessment for Your Project | Systematic Training in Construction Management in, Pune | Project Management Course in, Pune

How to Conduct a Risk Assessment for Your Project | Systematic Training in Construction Management in, Pune | 
Project Management Course in, Pune

One of the biggest challenges of project management is dealing with risks and opportunities.  The difference between success and failure can come down to proper management of your risks and opportunities.First, it's important to understand the difference between an issue and a risk. A risk is something that might happen, while an issue is something that has happened. For example, climate change is an issue.The first step to managing risks is to identify them early and take actions that reduce them, known as mitigations. A key tool to help you manage risk is a Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA). You use this to find and prioritize your risks.

There are four stages to building your FMEA:

  1. What are the risks that might arise during the project?
  2. How important are these risks?
  3. How should we respond to these risks?
  4. Mitigate

What are the risks that might arise during the project?

Gather a group of people, some who understand the project well, but also a couple pairs of fresh eyes. All the disciplines that are involved in the project should be represented, possibly including engineering, manufacturing, sales, support, and marketing. Once you’ve gathered the group, it’s time for some brainstorming. I like to break the problem into categories, like mechanical and electrical, to help make sure every area of the project is touched upon. No risk is too small, and everything is added to the list without filtering. There’s just enough discussion that the team agrees what the risk is and the text is unambiguous. Let everything sit for a few days. It’s not unusual for someone to email you with more ideas after the meeting. Just add everything to the list.

How important are these risks?

After a few days, convene the group again. Add any ideas for risks that have occurred to people since the last meeting, but don’t restart the brainstorming. Then it’s time to get to the hard part, quantifying the risks for severity and probability. First, set the ground rules. Each risk should be rated on a 1 to 5 scale for severity and probability. Some teams like a 1 to 3 or 1 to 10 scale, but I find 1 to 5 provides the right amount of precision. The exact definitions can vary, so it’s important to define them for the project you’re scoring.


How and when should we respond to these risks?

After a few more days of letting things settle, bring the group together again. Your rules should state a threshold and all risks with an RPN above that number must have a mitigation that should move the RPN below the threshold. Looking at our example we’ll create mitigations for risks with an RPN more than 5.

  • Temperature exceeds material limits
    It’s hard to imagine a situation where the temperature of the device exceeding your material limit not being very bad, so we’re better off attacking probability than severity. A solution to this might be to select a material that can tolerate very high temperatures or add a design element that effectively limits the maximum temperature.
  • Pressure vessel fails
    Like the temperature risk, we’re better off going for probability. One possible approach is to do a finite-element analysis (FAE), which is a computer simulation of the forces on the device. If the FEA says our design is safe with a margin of 100%, we can set the probability to 1.
  • Power demand exceed requirements
    Our initial calculations suggest that the power demand is likely to exceed what our marketing team wants by 20%. The marketing team says that 97% of the market can provide 30% more power than the current requirement and they’re okay with changing the requirement. Often the mitigation is changing a requirement, not the design.
  • Weight exceeds requirement
    The RPN here is below our threshold, so there’s no need to create a mitigation plan.
  • Mitigate and Monitor
    It’s now time for the team to implement the mitigations. After an agreed amount of time the same team should meet and review the situation.
    Have we selected a material or a control mechanism to lower the maximum temperature?
    What did the FAE show about the forces on the pressure vessel?
    Have we updated the requirements document with the new power requirements?
    Have we learned of any new risks that we neglected previously?                   
    In my example, I’ve focused on how things can unexpectedly go wrong, but the same process can be used on how sometimes things go better than expected. Capturing opportunities is almost as important as resolving risks.
    The intention is to reduce risks and uncertainty early, because some of the mitigations might force a significant redesign, which is a lot easier early in the project. The FMEA is just the starting point. Go forth and reduce uncertainty and successfully deliver to your stakeholders’ delight!
    The RPN here is below our threshold, so there’s no need to create a mitigation plan.

Article used by Institute of Infrastructure Studies and Construction Management, Pune (IISCM​) for educational purposes.

Latest innovations in civil engineering | M. Tech ...
Construction Project Management | Construction Man...

Related Posts

Enquiry Form
Admission Open for Year 2020-21.
GET MORE INFORMATION
ENQUIRE FOR ADMISSION DETAILS
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input